Saturday, February 16, 2013

Feds declare using criminal background checks to screen employees might be racist

The EEOC issued guidelines nearly a year ago that make it more difficult for employers to use criminal background checks to screen employees. The EEOC determined blacks and Hispanics are incarcerated at rates that are "disproportionate" to their share of the population. Thus the use of criminal background checks in the hiring process might be considered discrimination as they could have a disparate impact on minorities. Instead of writing a column telling you what the EEOC says, I will just publish excerpts of their guidelines so you can see the new policy in the EEOC's own words:

"A covered employer is liable for violating Title VII when the plaintiff demonstrates that it treated him differently because of his race, national origin, or another protected basis" (This is established law. Nothing new in this statement.)

"A covered employer is liable for violating Title VII when the plaintiff demonstrates that the employer’s neutral policy or practice has the effect of disproportionately screening out a Title VII-protected group and the employer fails to demonstrate that the policy or practice is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity." (Here comes the shift.)

"Nationally, African Americans and Hispanics are arrested in numbers disproportionate to their representation in the general population. In 2010, 28% of all arrests were of African Americans, even though African Americans only comprised approximately 14% of the general population. In 2008, Hispanics were arrested for federal drug charges at a rate of approximately three times their proportion of the general population. Moreover, African Americans and Hispanics were more likely than Whites to be arrested, convicted, or sentenced for drug offenses even though their rate of drug use is similar to the rate of drug use for Whites.

African Americans and Hispanics also are incarcerated at rates disproportionate to their numbers in the general population. Based on national incarceration data, the U.S. Department of Justice estimated in 2001 that 1 out of every 17 White men (5.9% of the White men in the U.S.) is expected to go to prison at some point during his lifetime, assuming that current incarceration rates remain unchanged. This rate climbs to 1 in 6 (or 17.2%) for Hispanic men. For African American men, the rate of expected incarceration rises to 1 in 3 (or 32.2%). Based on a state-by-state examination of incarceration rates in 2005, African Americans were incarcerated at a rate 5.6 times higher than Whites, and 7 states had a Black-to-White ratio of incarceration that was 10 to1. In 2010, Black men had an imprisonment rate that was nearly 7 times higher than White men and almost 3 times higher than Hispanic men." (For all the talk of "disproportionate, no one asks the question if they are simply committing more crimes, regardless of reason.)


"National data, such as that cited above, supports a finding that criminal record exclusions have a disparate impact based on race and national origin. The national data provides a basis for the Commission to further investigate such Title VII disparate impact charges. During an EEOC investigation, the employer also has an opportunity to show, with relevant evidence, that its employment policy or practice does not cause a disparate impact on the protected group(s). For example, an employer may present regional or local data showing that African American and/or Hispanic men are not arrested or convicted at disproportionately higher rates in the employer’s particular geographic area. An employer also may use its own applicant data to demonstrate that its policy or practice did not cause a disparate impact." (Now the velvet glove is removed and the EEOC's iron fist appears. Some convict gets mad because he didn't get a job, he runs to the EEOC to file a complaint. The employer than has to deal with a federal investigation and if the convict gets permission to sue from the EEOC, here comes the lawsuit. But wait, it gets better.)

"An employer’s evidence of a racially balanced workforce will not be enough to disprove disparate impact. In Connecticut v. Teal, the Supreme Court held that a “bottom line” racial balance in the workforce does not preclude employees from establishing a prima facie case of disparate impact; nor does it provide employers with a defense. The issue is whether the policy or practice deprives a disproportionate number of Title VII-protected individuals of employment opportunities." (Use diversity goals in hiring? Have a staff that is 80% black in an area that is 80% white? Doesn't matter. Convict gets to go after business as it dared to try to find out if he was a convict.)

However, the feds do give an employer some defense: "To establish that a criminal conduct exclusion that has a disparate impact is job related and consistent with business necessity under Title VII, the employer needs to show that the policy operates to effectively link specific criminal conduct, and its dangers, with the risks inherent in the duties of a particular position." Good luck with that one. But it the employer does reject the applicant based on his conviction, the EEOC has a few ideas for him:

"The employer develops a targeted screen considering at least the nature of the crime, the time elapsed, and the nature of the job and then provides an opportunity for an individualized assessment for people excluded by the screen to determine whether the policy as applied is job related and consistent with business necessity.

The individualized assessment would consist of notice to the individual that he has been screened out because of a criminal conviction; an opportunity for the individual to demonstrate that the exclusion should not be applied due to his particular circumstances; and consideration by the employer as to whether the additional information provided by the individual warrants an exception to the exclusion and shows that the policy as applied is not job related and consistent with business necessity.." (Reject the convict because he is a convict? Get bogged down in paperwork.)

Suppose there is a state or local law requiring a criminal background check for employees? Tough luck. The EEOC takes the position it preempts such laws:

"States and local jurisdictions also have laws and/or regulations that restrict or prohibit the employment of individuals with records of certain criminal conduct. Unlike federal laws or regulations, however, state and local laws or regulations are preempted by Title VII if they “purport[] to require or permit the doing of any act which would be an unlawful employment practice” under Title VII. Therefore, if an employer’s exclusionary policy or practice is not job related and consistent with business necessity, the fact that it was adopted to comply with a state or local law or regulation does not shield the employer from Title VII liability"

Worried? Wondering what to do? The EEOC has a simple solution for you: "Eliminate policies or practices that exclude people from employment based on any criminal record." 

You simply can't make this up.

EEOC Guidelines on using criminal background checks

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

Does this mean that criminals are also racist?

Shadowfax said...

Keep in mind, however, that the EEOC does not make policy. It issues opinions and publishes copious amounts of what it calls 'guidance'. Then it does what any community organizer does best ~ it agitates. Nothing much really new as this has been their guiding light for a number of years. They've just rewritten it and made it sound harsher.

Some states have 'outlawed' an employer's ability to run criminal history as part of the background check.

Mississippi's own (once) perennial master of 'most bills filed', Eric Flemming, a few years ago filed a bill to make the practice illegal in Mississippi. As with most of his labor-aggitation bills, that one flopped on the floor like a dying fish gasping for oxygen.

Actually 'running' the criminal history on all being considered for employment cannot be illegal. It's in the 'using' of the information or 'what comes next' that the EEOC will attempt to nail balls to the wall and stir up lawsuits.

Anonymous said...

So, you have a loved one in a nursing home, do you want an ex-con around that person without supervision? Go ahead hire them, frisk them every hour, and pack your own heat for necessity. Get these damn idiots out of here. A small business at Byram, was fined $20K for firing a pregnant waitress. I wonder how many warnings she got for tardiness, etc before he released her. I'm told the city of Jackson, carries 30% more employees than it needs, because that's the figure that won't show up on a given day. Give Washington DC, NY,NY and Boston to the democrats and form a new republic with the rest of the country.

Anonymous said...

The EEOC can easily fix that problem. Just bus in some of the desired or undesired population members into the area and problem solved.

Anonymous said...

people make mistakes in life. Our criminal justice system follows people around the rest of their lives and keeps them from getting better jobs than construction or waiting tables. Take a young man who had an ounce of pot for personal consumption that got arrested withing 100 yards of a school or a church, he will have a felony that will be his downfall the rest of his life. Or even a DUI conviction, everyone is human and prone to stupidity. Does an employer really have the right to dig into your past and judge you. If so, then all administrators and managers should have explosive chips in their necks set to detonate if they look at porn or jerk off.

Anonymous said...

Why wasn't the pothead or the drunk at work or looking for a job instead of breaking the law. The record may of not been an issue.

Anonymous said...

There are plenty of people who smoke dope and drink that aren't drug addicts. Just because you are a baptist who won't speak to your friends in the liquor store or have sex standing cause your church buddies might think you were dancing doesn't mean the rest of us share your moral slant. Plenty of people smoke a joint and are successful business owners who work everyday or have three beers and blow .081 and get thrown to the wolves in the legal system.

Anonymous said...

I am not a Baptist, THANK YOU! I am fairly pissed with organized religion right now, because the leaders have drank the kool aid (like you 2:57)and are becoming politically correct, and too damn liberal for my morals.

Shadowfax said...

An employer is still at liberty to refuse to hire based on a criminal record. No cause for alarm. Talk to your employment law attorney.

On the other side of this coin, many employers have been found guilty of negligence for either NOT checking backgrounds or for knowingly hiring felons to work in positions for which they should obviously have been denied employment.

Anonymous said...

What EEOC says means nothing.No legal standing.

Kingfish said...

Yes, because plenty of businesses have a stack of cash to spend on lawyers to fight the EEOC. Its not about force of law in court, its about whether you have the money to spend on a court fight with the EEOC.

Anonymous said...

There's an easy fix for this:

Reform the criminal code to treat the population like autonomous adults and get rid of the ideology-based "drug laws".

Save money, actually have a population responsible for itself, and-let the R's and D's gasp-let people enjoy liberty.

But it might not be good for the prison industry, so I won't hold my breath.

Anonymous said...

Fight the EEOC? I didn't know the EEOC ever fought. I thought all they did was talk. It is a government organization isn't it? If so, they probably try to avoid any real work.

Anonymous said...

um, if blacks and hispanics are committing a lions share of all crime then it stands to reason that they also occupy a lions share of "criminal back ground data".
The eeoc must be run by a bunch of retards if they have a problem with back ground checks...

Anonymous said...

i've been hired to fight some EEOC junk. what struck me was going to their offices in the federal building and seeing their staff is 90% black. one woman there actually told me to have my client 'just pay $100 to the claimant' to make it go away. when i told him that he was so offended he ended up paying me a couple of grand because it was bogus. but i realize most can't afford to stand on principle...

No Criminal Record said...

What?????????? Who is committing the majority of the crimes and getting arrested and jailed????? Wow! Then they are shocked that no one wants to hire there criminal ass!!! EEOC hahahahahahahaha

Anonymous said...

For those who think the EEOC is a paper tiger, ask the hundreds of thousands of business managers whose assholes have tightened up at the sight of their return address on an envelope. S-Fax is correct about their authority and agenda, but, they do have the ability to cause considerable intestinal turmoil.

Anonymous said...

"I'm from the government, and I'm here to help"

Anonymous said...

"Then it does what any community organizer does best ~ it agitates." Good one.

excellent point at 4:46, KF

Who is the hottest reporter?

Suscribe to latest on JJ.

Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Loading...

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Who is the Hottest Reporter in Jackson?

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.